Hi Paul, On Thu, 22 May 2014 09:44:46 -0400 Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Indeed - and I now see that commit when I switch over to my tip repo. > > However 12665b35b0b4 is not present in linux-next of yesterday or today > (21/22) for some reason. The tip/auto-latest merged into next has this: > > commit 1974363f7e899dc1b9e6e774dc885c7980a7159b > Merge: 67367e2c3f76 7fd44dacdd80 > Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thu May 8 12:40:28 2014 +0200 > > Merge branch 'x86/x32' > > as its top commit. Today's auto-latest in tip shows a similar merge, but > with today's date (and it contains Boris' warning fix too.) Adding Stephen > to CC in case it is something related to linux-next infrastructure. Ingo and co like to give the tip tree components some pretty good testing before they expose it to linux-next, though usually there is not this long a break between updates. The auto-latest branch has been updated for today's linux-next. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature