Hi,
sorry, I posted a related patch today ('[PATCH] ath9k: fix build error with
disabled debug'), but seems did not manage to set the correct in-reply-to field.
On 05/21/2014 02:12 PM, Julian Calaby wrote:
> Hi Rajkumar,
>
> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 9:01 PM, Rajkumar Manoharan
> <rmanohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 09:31:16AM -0700, Jim Davis wrote:
>>> Building with the attached random configuration file,
>>>
>>> In file included from drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/eeprom.h:22:0,
>>> from drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.h:27,
>>> from drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/dfs.c:18:
>>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/dfs.c: In function ‘ath9k_dfs_process_phyerr’:
>>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/dfs.c:185:14: error: ‘struct ath_softc’
>>> has no member named ‘debug’
>>> pe.ts - sc->debug.stats.dfs_stats.last_ts);
>>> ^
>>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/../ath.h:273:41: note: in definition of
>>> macro ‘ath_dbg’
>>> ath_printk(KERN_DEBUG, common, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
>>> ^
>>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/dfs.c:186:5: error: ‘struct ath_softc’
>>> has no member named ‘debug’
>>> sc->debug.stats.dfs_stats.last_ts = pe.ts;
>>> ^
>>> make[5]: *** [drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/dfs.o] Error 1
>>
>> Please select CONFIG_ATH9K_DEBUGFS.
>
> The point of randconfig builds is to ensure that there it's really
> unlikely that there are any config combinations that don't build, even
> if they're utterly insane.
>
> You should really change the ath9k Kconfig rules or move or add ifdefs
> to prevent this from being possible.
>
> Thanks,
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
