Hi, sorry, I posted a related patch today ('[PATCH] ath9k: fix build error with disabled debug'), but seems did not manage to set the correct in-reply-to field. On 05/21/2014 02:12 PM, Julian Calaby wrote: > Hi Rajkumar, > > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 9:01 PM, Rajkumar Manoharan > <rmanohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 09:31:16AM -0700, Jim Davis wrote: >>> Building with the attached random configuration file, >>> >>> In file included from drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/eeprom.h:22:0, >>> from drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.h:27, >>> from drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/dfs.c:18: >>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/dfs.c: In function ‘ath9k_dfs_process_phyerr’: >>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/dfs.c:185:14: error: ‘struct ath_softc’ >>> has no member named ‘debug’ >>> pe.ts - sc->debug.stats.dfs_stats.last_ts); >>> ^ >>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/../ath.h:273:41: note: in definition of >>> macro ‘ath_dbg’ >>> ath_printk(KERN_DEBUG, common, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \ >>> ^ >>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/dfs.c:186:5: error: ‘struct ath_softc’ >>> has no member named ‘debug’ >>> sc->debug.stats.dfs_stats.last_ts = pe.ts; >>> ^ >>> make[5]: *** [drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/dfs.o] Error 1 >> >> Please select CONFIG_ATH9K_DEBUGFS. > > The point of randconfig builds is to ensure that there it's really > unlikely that there are any config combinations that don't build, even > if they're utterly insane. > > You should really change the ath9k Kconfig rules or move or add ifdefs > to prevent this from being possible. > > Thanks, > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html