Hi James,
> Subject: [PATCH] compiler.h: avoid sparse errors in
> __compiletime_error_fallback()
>
> Usually, BUG_ON and friends aren't even evaluated in sparse, but
> recently compiletime_assert_atomic_type() was added, and that now
> results in a sparse warning every time it is used.
>
> The reason turns out to be the temporary variable, after it sparse no
> longer considers the value to be a constant, and results in a warning
> and an error. The error is the more annoying part of this as it
> suppresses any further warnings in the same file, hiding other problems.
>
> Unfortunately the condition cannot be simply expanded out to avoid the
> temporary variable since it breaks compiletime_assert on old versions of
> GCC such as GCC 4.2.4 which the latest metag compiler is based on.
>
> Therefore #ifndef __CHECKER__ out the __compiletime_error_fallback which
> uses the potentially negative size array to trigger a conditional
> compiler error, so that sparse doesn't see it.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Daniel Santos <daniel.santos@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> It's not particularly pretty, if you can think of a better solution that
> doesn't break old GCC I'm all ears.
> #ifndef __compiletime_error
> # define __compiletime_error(message)
> -# define __compiletime_error_fallback(condition) \
> +/*
> + * Sparse complains of variable sized arrays due to the temporary variable in
> + * __compiletime_assert. Unfortunately we can't just expand it out to make
> + * sparse see a constant array size without breaking compiletime_assert on old
> + * versions of GCC (e.g. 4.2.4), so hide the array from sparse altogether.
> + */
> +# ifndef __CHECKER__
> +# define __compiletime_error_fallback(condition) \
> do { ((void)sizeof(char[1 - 2 * condition])); } while (0)
> -#else
> +# endif
> +#endif
> +#ifndef __compiletime_error_fallback
> # define __compiletime_error_fallback(condition) do { } while (0)
> #endif
That's pretty much what I had in mind, I may have expressed it a bit
differently but the end result is the same.
Thanks,
johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
