Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with Linus' tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 24 Mar 2014, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got conflicts in
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c and
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c between commit 825938307f81 ("Revert
> "drm/i915: don't touch the VDD when disabling the panel"") from Linus'
> tree and commits 4be7378004a0 ("drm/i915: drop ironlake_ prefix from edp
> panel/backlight functions"), dce56b3c626f ("drm/i915: save some time when
> waiting the eDP timings") and b3064154dfd3 ("drm/i915: Don't just say it,
> actually force edp vdd") from the drm tree.
>
> This latter commit in the drm tree seems to be solving the same problem
> as the one in Linus' tree (but slightly differently), so I just
> effectively dropped the patch from Linus' tree and can carry the fix as
> necessary (no action is required).

Ack. We took the long route in our -next to come to the conclusion that
a revert is the way to go, and that was then queued for 3.14.

Thanks,
Jani.


-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux