On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 19 Mar 2014 08:30:08 -0700, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 10:27:36PM +0000, Russell King wrote: >> > However, I still find myself coming back to a fundamental question: why >> > were these bindings fine in April 2013, passed review, and were acked, >> > but not fine today. Here's the links to the emails acking their >> > introduction which Sylwester Nawrocki sent me: >> > >> > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg61899.html >> > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg62458.html >> > >> > So... *shrug*. Make of this what you will. >> >> Thanks for the details, I'll just leave my tree as-is for now, as that >> seems the simplest thing to do. > > Yes, please leave it in your tree. I've caused noise and trouble than I > should, and could have handled it differently. I apologize. s/should/should not have/ g. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
