On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 09:14:55AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Thu, 2014-03-13 at 11:37 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > On Wed, 2014-03-12 at 16:21 -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > > > It's a series of rather complex patches. I really don't think > > > duplicating them is a good idea. We can either resurrect the old API > > > to kill it again or set up a merge branch which I don't think is too > > > unusual in situations like this. > > > > Right, a topic branch that gets merged in both driver-core-next and > > powerpc-next. > > Just want to make sure we agree ... ie, the offending commit is already > in powerpc-next on my side and I can't really back it out (I could > revert it though). You can pull in driver-core-next into your tree if you want, it's not going to be reverted, and will be sent to Linus for 3.15-rc1, so you can base your work on it and fix up the api usage in your tree that way. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
