On Fri, 7 Mar 2014 11:05:49 -0600 (CST) Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 6 Mar 2014, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > So, by "the whole series" do you mean just/all these: > > > > > > percpu-add-raw_cpu_ops.patch > > > ... > > > sh-replace-__get_cpu_var-uses.patch > > > > Yep. Commented out in http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/series > > > > > If so, I will remove them from my tree today (if you don't get around to > > > a new mmotm before then). > > > > Cool. > > I need at least the initial 5 patches that establish the framework in > -next and do the debugging in order to make further progress on this one. I'll re-enable percpu-add-raw_cpu_ops.patch mm-use-raw_cpu-ops-for-determining-current-numa-node.patch modules-use-raw_cpu_write-for-initialization-of-per-cpu-refcount.patch net-replace-__this_cpu_inc-in-routec-with-raw_cpu_inc.patch percpu-add-preemption-checks-to-__this_cpu-ops.patch OK? > The rest are bits and pieces that may require some detail work. It looks like they will need quite a lot of work I'm afraid. The automated sweep wasn't very successful but it did demonstrate that there are nasties and gremlins all over the place. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
