[Re: [PATCH] samples/seccomp/Makefile: Do not build tests if cross-compiling for MIPS] On 17/02/2014 (Mon 13:22) Markos Chandras wrote: > On 02/14/2014 01:33 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > >On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 1:30 PM, David Daney <ddaney.cavm@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>Really I think we should add a Kconfig item for this and disable the whole > >>directory for targets that do not support it. > > > >Can we do something based on CONFIG_CROSS_COMPILE vs. adding more Kconfig? > > > >Paul. > >-- > > Hi Paul, > > I am not sure how this would solve anything. CONFIG_CROSS_COMPILE > could be empty, but you can still use 'make > CROSS_COMPILE=mips-linux-foobar-' or whatever to cross-compile for > MIPS. So using this symbol to disable tests does not seem right to > me. > > Another Kconfig symbol should be more appropriate but as far as I > can see MIPS is the only architecture which has this problem (or I > may have missed all{yes,mod}config failures from other > architectures). > > I still think that an "ifndef CONFIG_MIPS" is good enough for now > until more architectures suffer from this problem in the future. So > far (and looking at the git history of that file) other > architectures managed to workaround this. I don't have a specific preference to any one fix over another; I leave that to the seccomp folks who review the fix. But I would like to see it dealt with ASAP. The regression has been in linux-next for roughly a week now, and doing that can mask us from seeing other build regressions silently stacking up behind this one. Thanks, Paul. -- > > -- markos > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html