On Wed, Jan 29 2014, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Today's linux-next merge of the btrfs tree got a conflict in
> fs/btrfs/acl.c between commit 996a710d4641 ("btrfs: use generic posix ACL
> infrastructure") from the tree and commit cfad95253440 ("btrfs: remove
> dead code") from the btrfs tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I used the version from Linus' tree) and can carry the fix
> as necessary (no action is required).
That sounds correct. My commit [cfad95253440: btrfs: remove dead code]
can be dropped, since Christoph's commit completely rewrites
btrfs_init_acl function.
--
Best regards, _ _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science, Michał “mina86” Nazarewicz (o o)
ooo +--<mpn@xxxxxxxxxx>--<xmpp:mina86@xxxxxxxxxx>--ooO--(_)--Ooo--
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
