Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel tree with the drm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 2:06 AM, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 4:04 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the drm-intel tree got a conflict in
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c between commit abca9e454498 ("drm: Pass
>> 'flags' from the caller to .get_scanout_position()") from the drm tree
>> and commit d59a63ad8234 ("drm/i915: Add intel_get_crtc_scanline()") from
>> the drm-intel tree.
>>
>> I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary
>> (no action is required).
>
> Oops, this patch escaped - it's only for 3.15. I've shuffled my
> branches around now for the merge window so this should not pop up in
> your -next tree again until 3.15 starts.

I just bisected boot failures on x86 chromebooks with -next to this
merge commit. I'll take a look tomorrow morning and make sure they're
gone.


-Olof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux