On Sat, 2014-01-18 at 13:44 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 10:46:06AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > > I hope it doesn't look quite like that, next-20140117 is -ENOBOOT on > > Q6600 box. See below for an alternative. > > Urgh, I see, we call the idle arch_cpu_idle() callback with irqs > disabled. > > Could something like this work? > > local_irq_enable(); > mwait_idle_with_hints(0,0); > > The interrupt enable window is slightly larger, but I'm not immediately > seeing a problem with that. Yup, works just fine. Less is more. Nice to see a _progression_ in the pipe too btw. -Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
