Hi Stephen,
Thanks for the fix! I actually just got an updated set for most of the
patches currently in the for_next tree for xtensa and might have to do a
rebase to integrate them better. I'll include your fix when I come
across the issue.
Thanks again,
-Chris
On 1/12/14 7:26 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in
arch/xtensa/include/asm/barrier.h between commit dbacef090841 ("xtensa:
add SMP support") from the xtensa tree and commit 93ea02bb8435 ("arch:
Clean up asm/barrier.h implementations using asm-generic/barrier.h") from
the tip tree.
I fixed it up (I am pretty sure - see below) and can carry the fix as
necessary (no action is required).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
