Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sh tree with the tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi all,

On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 09:47:24 +0900 Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 11:11:03PM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
> >
> > The request to merge the sh code came through Simon with claimed
> > agreement from SH maintainers to do so -- I didn't verify this since
> > they have in the past been well-coordinated. Simon?
> 
> I spoke with Paul recently and my understanding is that
> he hasn't been actively working in this area for over a year now.
> 
> I guess there are some stale patches in his tree.

That is certainly what it looks like.  So, do I remove the sh{,.-current)
trees (git://github.com/pmundt/linux-sh.git#sh-{latest,fixes-for-linus})
from linux-next permanently?  Will it be cleaned up any time soon?

Is anyone maintaining/supporting sh now?  Is it a candidate for pruning?
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: pgp_VcKY6lMV2.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux