Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tip tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/07/2014 02:00 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Andrew,

Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in
arch/x86/mm/numa.c between commit f3d815cb854b ("x86/mm/numa: Fix 32-bit
kernel NUMA boot") from the tip tree and commit 1459be89954e ("x86: get
pg_data_t's memory from other node") from the akpm-current tree.

These appear to be two very similar solutions, I fixed it up (see below -
I (arbitrarily) chose to keep the actual allocation from the tip tree, but
the messages from the akpm-current tree) and can carry the fix as
necessary (no action is required).


memblock_alloc_nid() and __memblock_alloc_base() will call
memblock_alloc_base_nid() in the end. So I think it is OK to me.

I will do some tests when they are merged.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux