Re: [RFC PATCH net-next] packet: fix using smp_processor_id() in preemptible code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 07:55:03 +0800 Li Zhong <zhong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 10:55 +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> > On 12/12/2013 07:10 AM, Li Zhong wrote:
[...]
> > > Also, it seems that we could move skb_set_queue_mapping() into
> > > packet_pick_tx_queue(), so we avoid calling it one more time
> > > unnecessarily if we are going into the normal dev_queue_xmit() code
> > > path.
> > 
> > I don't agree with that part, I think this can be also beneficiary for
> > packets without direct xmit, as in PF_PACKET we don't have a notion of
> > "flow" but just raw packets instead, and can keep the mapping local
> > depending on the current CPU as we do queue setting elsewhere in the
> > stack just as well.
> 
> It seems to me that the newly added xmit in packet_sock is
> dev_queue_xmit() by default, and in this default case, dev_queue_xmit()
> would call netdev_pick_tx(), which would set the skb queue_mapping again
> to override the value based on the current CPU. 

Yes, I think you are right, that is also my experience with the code path.

> Or did I miss something here? 

A bit related; One thing I'm missing to understand, is why the
RAW/PF_PACKET sockets have a NULL in skb->sk when they reach
__netdev_pick_tx() ? (resulting in they cannot store/cache the queue in
sk_tx_queue_set)

-- 
Best regards,
  Jesper Dangaard Brouer
  MSc.CS, Sr. Network Kernel Developer at Red Hat
  Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux