From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 11:49:59 +1100
> Hi Dave,
>
> On Wed, 11 Dec 2013 19:36:39 -0500 (EST) David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 11:15:39 +1100
>>
>> > Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in
>> > drivers/net/macvtap.c between commit ce232ce01d61 ("macvtap: signal
>> > truncated packets") from the net tree and commit 55ec8e25cd97 ("macvtap:
>> > remove unused parameter in macvtap_do_read()") from the net-next tree.
>> >
>> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
>> > is required).
>>
>> The net-next commit in question was reverted last night.
>
> Actually, the only relevant revert in the net-next tree I fetched this
> morning is commit de2aa4760b45 (Revert "macvtap: remove useless codes in
> macvtap_aio_read() and macvtap_recvmsg()") which reverts 41e4af69a598,
> not the commit mentioned above. Unless you haven't pushed out the
> net-next tree with a later revert ...
Indeed, I was confusing those two commits. Ok I should probably
revert that one too.
I'll go ahead and do that now, because it's the most straightforward
way to avoid this merge conflict.
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
