On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 1:00 AM, David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 4 Dec 2013, Sima Baymani wrote: > >> When generating randconfig, got following warning: >> >> warning: (HWPOISON_INJECT && MEM_SOFT_DIRTY) selects PROC_PAGE_MONITOR >> which has unmet direct dependencies (PROC_FS && MMU) >> >> I would have liked to form a patch for it, but not sure whether to >> simply add PROC_FS && MMU as dependencies for HWPOISON_INJECT and >> MEM_SOFT_DIRTY, or if some other fix would be more suitable? >> > > CONFIG_HWPOISON_INJECT is unrelated, it already depends on CONFIG_PROC_FS. > > CONFIG_PROC_PAGE_MONITOR is obviously only useful for CONFIG_PROC_FS, so > the correct fix would be to make CONFIG_MEM_SOFT_DIRTY depend on > CONFIG_PROC_FS. > > Want to try sending a patch? You bet! However, I have the slightest confusion: I tested what you suggested by running "make oldconfig", and it does eliminate the error. However, I can't figure out why it's enough with adding the dependency for PROC_FS in MEM_SOFT_DIRTY, if PROC_PAGE_MONITOR depends on both? -Sima -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
