On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 15:52 +0000, John W. Linville wrote:
> > Today's linux-next merge of the wireless-next tree got a conflict in
> > net/mac80211/util.c between commit 3f718fd8401d ("mac80211: fix the mesh
> > channel switch support") from the wireless tree and commit ca91dc97b8a0
> > ("mac80211: use put_unaligned_le16 for precedence value in mesh") from
> > the wireless-next tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> > is required).
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > diff --cc net/mac80211/util.c
> > index 9f9b9bd3fd44,06265d7f8cc3..000000000000
> > --- a/net/mac80211/util.c
> > +++ b/net/mac80211/util.c
> > @@@ -2457,9 -2481,13 +2479,8 @@@ int ieee80211_send_action_csa(struct ie
> > WLAN_EID_CHAN_SWITCH_PARAM_TX_RESTRICT : 0x00;
> > put_unaligned_le16(WLAN_REASON_MESH_CHAN, pos); /* Reason Cd */
> > pos += 2;
> > - pre_value = cpu_to_le16(ifmsh->pre_value);
> > - memcpy(pos, &pre_value, 2); /* Precedence Value */
> > - if (!ifmsh->pre_value)
> > - ifmsh->pre_value = 1;
> > - else
> > - ifmsh->pre_value++;
> > + put_unaligned_le16(ifmsh->pre_value, pos);/* Precedence Value */
> > pos += 2;
> > - ifmsh->chsw_init = true;
> > }
> >
> > ieee80211_tx_skb(sdata, skb);
>
> This differs from how I resolved the conflict when merging in wireless-testing...
>
> Johannes, could you comment on which (if either) of these options is correct?
I think the above is correct, the pre_value assignment with 1/++ and
chsw_init moved into another function in Bob's patch. Bob?
johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
