Am Montag, 2. Dezember 2013, 23:31:31 schrieb Andrew Morton:
> On Tue, 03 Dec 2013 08:16:04 +0100 Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
wrote:
> > Andrew,
> >
> > Am Dienstag, 3. Dezember 2013, 12:52:19 schrieb Stephen Rothwell:
> > > Hi Andrew,
> > >
> > > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in
> > > arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c between commit 8ed12fcc194d ("um: Rename
> > > print_stack_trace to do_stack_trace") from Linus' tree and commit
> > > ce89e7878311 ("arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c: rename print_stack_trace()") from
> > > the akpm-current tree.
> > >
> > > I fixed it up (I used the version fro, Linus' tree) and can carry the
> > > fix
> > > as necessary (no action is required).
> >
> > How comes that this patch landed in your tree, I didn't receive a mail
> > from
> > your bot?
>
> Coz after I wrote it I carefully added cc:richrd@xxxxxx ;)
I see, time to add a few more alias to my MTA. ;-)
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
