On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 06:02:42PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 09:55:29AM +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> >
> > As per Hannes' suggestion, the result should look like (see cover
> > letter in [1]):
> >
> > if (r->entropy_total > 128) {
> > r->initialized = 1;
> > r->entropy_total = 0;
> > if (r == &nonblocking_pool) {
> > prandom_reseed_late();
> > pr_notice("random: %s pool is initialized\n",
> > r->name);
> > }
> > }
>
> Agreed. What's the schedule for pushing net-dev to Linus? I'm
> currently at Korea Linux Forum, and I was originally planning on
> pushing random.git to Linus sometime today, but I'm also willing to
> wait for net-dev to go first. Either way, we should make sure Linus
> is aware of the agreed-upon resolution of the merge conflict.
net-next is already on its way: http://markmail.org/message/ihccweynhtpdd66u
Greetings,
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
