On 11/07/2013 01:25 PM, Kent Overstreet wrote: > On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 01:20:26PM -0600, Dave Kleikamp wrote: >> I ended up replacing a call to bio_iovec_idx() with __bvec_iter_bvec() >> since the former was removed. It's not very elegant, but it works. I'm >> open to suggestions on a cleaner fix, but it can wait until one or both >> of these trees is merged. > > No, that's definitely wrong. Read Documentation/block/biovecs.txt - you > need to use either the new bio_iovec() or bio_iovec() iter. I can do the > conversion later today. Stephen, Can you please drop the aio-direct tree for the time being? My stuff is not aligning very well with the immutable biovecs and Kent has a different approach in mind. I'll be working with him on a replacement that will hopefully be simpler. Thanks, Shaggy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
