Hi Jörn,
After merging the bcon tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/block/blockconsole.c: In function 'sync_read':
drivers/block/blockconsole.c:184:5: error: 'struct bio' has no member named 'bi_idx'
bio.bi_idx = 0;
^
drivers/block/blockconsole.c:185:5: error: 'struct bio' has no member named 'bi_size'
bio.bi_size = SECTOR_SIZE;
^
drivers/block/blockconsole.c:187:5: error: 'struct bio' has no member named 'bi_sector'
bio.bi_sector = ofs >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
^
drivers/block/blockconsole.c: In function 'bcon_erase_segment':
drivers/block/blockconsole.c:215:6: error: 'struct bio' has no member named 'bi_size'
bio->bi_size = PAGE_SIZE;
^
drivers/block/blockconsole.c:218:6: error: 'struct bio' has no member named 'bi_idx'
bio->bi_idx = 0;
^
drivers/block/blockconsole.c:219:6: error: 'struct bio' has no member named 'bi_sector'
bio->bi_sector = (bc->write_bytes + i * PAGE_SIZE) >> 9;
^
drivers/block/blockconsole.c: In function 'bcon_writesector':
drivers/block/blockconsole.c:338:5: error: 'struct bio' has no member named 'bi_size'
bio->bi_size = SECTOR_SIZE;
^
drivers/block/blockconsole.c:343:5: error: 'struct bio' has no member named 'bi_idx'
bio->bi_idx = 0;
^
drivers/block/blockconsole.c:344:5: error: 'struct bio' has no member named 'bi_sector'
bio->bi_sector = bc->write_bytes >> 9;
^
Caused by changes in the block tree. Thierry Reding mentioned that you
didn't think that the bcon tree was linux-next material any more, so I
just dropped your tree. If that is incorrect, please let me know and I
will reinstate it and fix this merge conflict.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
pgpJExCnPMjLa.pgp
Description: PGP signature
