Re: linux-next: manual merge of the dt-rh tree with the powerpc tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2013-11-01 at 17:24 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 11/01/2013 12:20 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Rob,
> > 
> > Today's linux-next merge of the dt-rh tree got a conflict in 
> > arch/powerpc/include/asm/prom.h between commit a3e31b458844 ("of:
> > Move definition of of_find_next_cache_node into common code") from
> > the powerpc tree and commit 0c3f061c195c ("of: implement
> > of_node_to_nid as a weak function") from the dt-rh tree.
> 
> Ben, I can pick these 2 patches up instead if you want to drop them
> and avoid the conflict.

I'd rather not rebase my tree, the conflict seems to be rather trivial
to solve.

Cheers,
Ben.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux