* Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 08:24:42PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > In file included from /scratch/sfr/next/include/linux/mmzone.h:9:0,
> > from /scratch/sfr/next/include/linux/gfp.h:4,
> > from /scratch/sfr/next/include/linux/kmod.h:22,
> > from /scratch/sfr/next/include/linux/module.h:13,
> > from /scratch/sfr/next/block/blk-mq.c:2:
> > /scratch/sfr/next/block/blk-mq.c: In function 'blk_mq_queue_enter':
> > /scratch/sfr/next/include/linux/wait.h:772:2: error: expected ';' before '__ret'
> > __ret; \
> > ^
> > /scratch/sfr/next/block/blk-mq.c:108:8: note: in expansion of macro 'wait_event_interruptible_lock_irq'
> > ret = wait_event_interruptible_lock_irq(q->mq_freeze_wq,
> > ^
> > /scratch/sfr/next/block/blk-mq.c:108:6: error: void value not ignored as it ought to be
> > ret = wait_event_interruptible_lock_irq(q->mq_freeze_wq,
> > ^
> >
> > Caused by commit 35a2af94c7ce ("sched/wait: Make the __wait_event*()
> > interface more friendly").
> >
> > Since this was also in next-20131025, I applied the following merge fix
> > commit for today, please fix this in the tip tree.
>
> FWIW I got confirmation on Oct 23 that this had been committed to the
> tip tree. So I guess it just wasn't pushed yet.
I merged the fix intoo the linux-next branch earlier today so it
should be resolved soon.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
