On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 03:31:44PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > That's unfortunate. The fixes should be part of the tree IMO. What Stephen does (which does seem like a good policy) is to keep the tree at the previous day's version instead of taking a new version if it introduces breakages on the architectures he tests. That seems to strike a good balance between keeping things working for users and providing pushback to get things fixed before they go to Linus.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature