Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-arm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 16 October 2013 12:04, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 12:02:08PM -0700, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>> On 16 October 2013 11:58, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On 16/10/13 19:51, Thierry Reding wrote:
>> >> Today's linux-next merge of the kvm-arm tree got conflicts in
>> >>
>> >>       arch/arm/kvm/reset.c
>> >>
>> >> caused by commits e8c2d99 (KVM: ARM: Add support for Cortex-A7) and ac570e0
>> >> (ARM: kvm: rename cpu_reset to avoid name clash).
>> >>
>> >> I've fixed them up (see below). Please verify that the resolution looks
>> >> good.
>> >
>> > Looks good to me (I have the same resolution in my own tree).
>> >
>> Yes, fix is good.
>>
>> This will stay a conflict until kvm/next and kvm/fixes merge, which
>> doesn't happen before after the merge window, usually.  If that's
>> going to cause too many headaches, maybe we need to talk to the KVM
>> guys (cc'ed) about a solution until then.
>
> It shouldn't be a problem. Mark and I share the rerere cache, so unless
> the conflict changes somehow it'll get resolved automatically in future
> merges.
>
Cool, I had no idea how you dealt with these merges, but I figured a
daily manual operation was probably not how it works:)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux