On Mon, 2013-10-14 at 12:36 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Fix (a few hundred) build errors due to missing semi-colon when > KMEMCHECK is enabled: > > include/net/inet_timewait_sock.h:139:2: error: expected ',', ';' or '}' before 'int' > include/net/inet_timewait_sock.h:148:28: error: 'const struct inet_timewait_sock' has no member named 'tw_death_node' > > Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > include/net/inet_timewait_sock.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > --- next-2013-1014.orig/include/net/inet_timewait_sock.h > +++ next-2013-1014/include/net/inet_timewait_sock.h > @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ struct inet_timewait_sock { > tw_transparent : 1, > tw_pad : 6, /* 6 bits hole */ > tw_tos : 8, > - tw_pad2 : 16 /* 16 bits hole */ > + tw_pad2 : 16; /* 16 bits hole */ > kmemcheck_bitfield_end(flags); > u32 tw_ttd; > struct inet_bind_bucket *tw_tb; > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ Shouldn't this be done in kmemcheck.h? include/linux/kmemcheck.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/kmemcheck.h b/include/linux/kmemcheck.h index 39f8453..b9ffad5 100644 --- a/include/linux/kmemcheck.h +++ b/include/linux/kmemcheck.h @@ -62,10 +62,10 @@ bool kmemcheck_is_obj_initialized(unsigned long addr, size_t size); * kmemcheck_annotate_bitfield(a, flags); */ #define kmemcheck_bitfield_begin(name) \ - int name##_begin[0]; + int name##_begin[0] #define kmemcheck_bitfield_end(name) \ - int name##_end[0]; + int name##_end[0] #define kmemcheck_annotate_bitfield(ptr, name) \ do { \ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html