Hi Steffen,
On Wed, 25 Sep 2013 07:29:23 +0200 Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 09:59:19AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 12:25:05 +0200 Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 12:16:29PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Today's linux-next merge of the ipsec-next tree got a conflict in
> > > > include/net/xfrm.h between commit d511337a1eda ("xfrm.h: Remove extern
> > > > from function prototypes") from the net-next tree and commit aba826958830
> > > > ("{ipv4,xfrm}: Introduce xfrm_tunnel_notifier for xfrm tunnel mode
> > > > callback") from the ipsec-next tree.
> > >
> > > Thanks for the information, I'll do a rebase of the ipsec-next
> > > tree tomorrow.
> >
> > Did you miss the end of the next paragraph: "no action is required"?
> > Dave can fix this up (like I did) when he merges your tree into his.
>
> I applied this patch shortly before the merge window opened, it is a left
> over from the last develpoment cycle. I already rebased my tree onto
> net-next in the past if that happened, even if there were no merge
> conflicts. I did that just to see if everything still works. But I
> could also do a test merge to see if everything still works and ask
> to pull without a rebase then if this is the prefered way. Would make
> my life easier :)
That would be up to Dave ...
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
pgpKd2TVYWTOD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
