On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 11:48:23PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 03:41:16PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > Obtained from where? There are a whole pile of fixes resulting from > > review and linux-next testing. Are they included? > > -next and yes. The trivial ones - folded into the commits they are fixing > (I mean, ones directly following the commit being fixed). The rest included > as individual commits. > > I'm looking through the DCACHE_LRU_LIST mess right now... It's not that bad, actually; I think the variant I've pushed right now (vfs.git#for-next, head at f5e1dd34561e0fb06400b378d595198918833021) should be doing the right thing. It ought to cover everything in your branch in -next from "fs: bump inode and dentry counters to long" on to the end of queue. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
