Hi Stephen,
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 10:17:21 -0600 Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 08/27/2013 02:29 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra20-trimslice.dts between commit
> > 30ca2226bea6 ("ARM: tegra: always enable USB VBUS regulators") from
> > Linus' tree and commit 23f95ef2d951 ("ARM: tegra: use TEGRA_GPIO()
> > in a couple more places") from the arm-soc tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no
> > action is required).
>
> > diff --cc arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra20-trimslice.dts
>
> > usb@c5000000 { status = "okay"; - nvidia,vbus-gpio = <&gpio
> > TEGRA_GPIO(V, 2) GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; };
>
> That chunk isn't part of either of the two commits above.
Yeah.
> It is however part of commit 103566e "arm: tegra: Remove obsolete
> nvidia,vbus-gpio properties" from the USB tree, so it's fine that the
> change is part of linux-next.
>
> I'm just not sure if it's expected for that chunk to show up in this
> merge resolution email? If it's normal, then there's no problem; the
> issue would be with me not having too much git merge conflict
> resolution experience:-)
It did not actually cause a conflict that I had to fix manually, but is
part of the overall merge changes.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
pgpPAmpjHoiV4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
