Hi, On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 10:37:32AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 04:13:23PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > On 08/27/2013 04:05 PM, Benoit Cousson wrote: > > > On 27/08/2013 16:02, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > >> On 08/27/2013 03:57 PM, Benoit Cousson wrote: > > >>> + Kevin, > > >>> > > >>> On 27/08/2013 15:53, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > >>>> What do we do now? > > >>> > > >>> Cannot you just merge the stable arm-soc/dt branch into your branch > > >>> before applying your patches? > > >> > > >> That is up to Greg. This changes sat in his usb-next tree for a while > > >> now. And before they hit Greg they were in Felipe's tree for a while. > > >> > > >> To be exact, last .dts change via USB was: > > >> > > >> Author: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > >> AuthorDate: Thu Jun 20 12:13:04 2013 +0200 > > >> Commit: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> > > >> CommitDate: Fri Aug 9 17:40:16 2013 +0300 > > >> > > >> usb: musb dma: add cppi41 dma driver > > > > > > Mmm, if that branch is supposed to be stable, I'm not sure it will be > > > doable... > > > > > > Maybe we should do the other way around? And merge usb-next into > > > arm-soc/dt. > > > > > > Kevin, Olof? > > > > Please be aware that I have no response so far regarding [0] from Greg. > > > > [0] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg92595.html > > Nor will you, given that I am not the one to take these patches, Felipe > is. I noticed now that you said "please route around Felipe", but > sorry, no, I'm not going to do that unless there's a really good reason. > Felipe seems to be around at the moment, please work with him on this. If you will still take a 'part2' pull request from me, I can send you urgent bugfixes by friday. If I have some time left, I can even try to get that sorted out by tomorrow. cheers -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature