On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 20130628: >> >> The regulator tree gained a build failure so I used the version from >> next-20130628. >> >> The trivial tree gained a conflict against the fbdev tree. >> >> The arm-soc tree gained a conflict against the net-next tree. >> >> The akpm tree lost a few patches that turned up elsewhere and I removed 2 >> that were causing run time problems. >> > > [ CC drm and drm-intel folks ] > > [ Did not check any relevant MLs ] > > Please, see attached dmesg output. Clock mismatch, one for Jesse to figure out. Note that this patch is for 3.12, I simply haven't yet gotten around to properly split my patch queue so a few spilled into -next. I'll do that now. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
