Hi Mike,
Today's linux-next merge of the clk tree got a conflict in
drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c between commit 6082f908b060 ("clk:
exynos4: Staticize local symbols") from the samsung tree and commit
82ba93b27cf5 ("clk: exynos4: Fix clock aliases for cpufreq related
clocks") from the clk tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
diff --cc drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c
index 50af410,94c5e1a..0000000
--- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c
@@@ -355,9 -355,9 +355,9 @@@ static struct samsung_fixed_rate_clock
};
/* list of mux clocks supported in all exynos4 soc's */
-struct samsung_mux_clock exynos4_mux_clks[] __initdata = {
+static struct samsung_mux_clock exynos4_mux_clks[] __initdata = {
- MUX_F(mout_apll, "mout_apll", mout_apll_p, SRC_CPU, 0, 1,
- CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, 0),
+ MUX_FA(mout_apll, "mout_apll", mout_apll_p, SRC_CPU, 0, 1,
+ CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, 0, "mout_apll"),
MUX(none, "mout_hdmi", mout_hdmi_p, SRC_TV, 0, 1),
MUX(none, "mout_mfc1", sclk_evpll_p, SRC_MFC, 4, 1),
MUX(none, "mout_mfc", mout_mfc_p, SRC_MFC, 8, 1),
@@@ -423,9 -423,9 +423,9 @@@ static struct samsung_mux_clock exynos4
};
/* list of mux clocks supported in exynos4x12 soc */
-struct samsung_mux_clock exynos4x12_mux_clks[] __initdata = {
+static struct samsung_mux_clock exynos4x12_mux_clks[] __initdata = {
- MUX(mout_mpll_user_c, "mout_mpll_user_c", mout_mpll_user_p4x12,
- SRC_CPU, 24, 1),
+ MUX_A(mout_mpll_user_c, "mout_mpll_user_c", mout_mpll_user_p4x12,
+ SRC_CPU, 24, 1, "mout_mpll"),
MUX(none, "mout_aclk266_gps", aclk_p4412, SRC_TOP1, 4, 1),
MUX(none, "mout_aclk400_mcuisp", aclk_p4412, SRC_TOP1, 8, 1),
MUX(mout_mpll_user_t, "mout_mpll_user_t", mout_mpll_user_p4x12,
Attachment:
pgpMzdsAHix4W.pgp
Description: PGP signature
