Hi Andrew, On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 4:04 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 17:26:36 -0700 akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> >> linux-next-git-rejects.patch > > We must figure out why you sometimes get rejects that I do not get when I > import your series into a git tree. However in this case you resolution > is not quite right. It leaves 2 continue statements in > net/mac80211/iface.c at line 191 which will unconditionally short circuit > the enclosing loop. The version that will be in linux-next today is > correct (and git did it automatically as part of the merge of the old > linux-next tree). Do you have "git rerere" enabled? Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html