Re: linux-next: Tree for May 30

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Geert,

On Thu, 30 May 2013 10:07:48 +0200 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The following defconfigs fail without anything useful in the log:
>   - at91sam9g20_defconfig
>   - at91sam9261_defconfig
>   - at91sam9260_defconfig
> 
> A manual run reveals why:
> Can't find default configuration "arch/arm/configs/at91sam9g20_defconfig"!
> 
> This is due to the merge of several config files:
> 
> commit b3f442b0eedbc20b5ce3f4a96530588d14901199
> Author: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date:   Wed May 15 17:19:21 2013 +0200
> 
>     ARM: at91: udpate defconfigs
> 
>     Merge 9g20 with 9260 and 9g10 with 9261 as those SoCs can run from the same
>     kernel even in non DT world.
> 
>     Fix the sam9261ek to allow 9g10 and sam9261 to compile together.
> 
>     Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>     Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxx>

Thanks for letting me know.  I have stopped those three configs from
being built.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: pgpb93ShXsDkB.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux