Quoting Stephen Rothwell (2013-05-20 00:04:49)
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got conflicts in
> fs/btrfs/inode.c and fs/btrfs/volumes.c between commit 9be3395bcd4a
> ("Btrfs: use a btrfs bioset instead of abusing bio internals") from
> Linus' tree and commit "block: prep work for batch completion" from the
> akpm tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary
> (no action is required).
>
> I also noticed that a single conversion of bio_endio to bio_endio_batch
> is done in the akpm patch but bio_endio_batch is not introduced until a
> later patch ... :-(
Thanks, this looks right and I've linux-next through an aio/dio test on
btrfs.
Kent, reviewing the merge I see a missing bio_endio_batch conversion. I
think this was missing from the original:
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index faf20f5..a47bc10 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -7084,7 +7084,7 @@ static void btrfs_end_dio_bio(struct bio *bio, int err,
bio_io_error(dip->orig_bio);
} else {
set_bit(BIO_UPTODATE, &dip->dio_bio->bi_flags);
- bio_endio(dip->orig_bio, 0);
+ bio_endio_batch(dip->orig_bio, 0, batch);
}
out:
bio_put(bio);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
