On Sat, 11 May 2013 18:00:09 -0700 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > So this is the biggest -rc1 in the last several years (perhaps ever) ever (see http://neuling.org/linux-next-size.html after today's linux-next release). > Which was unexpected, because while linux-next was fairly big, it > wasn't exceptionally so. I'm sure Stephen Rothwell will talk about the > statistics of commits that weren't in -next, we'll see if that was the > reason.. Since you asked ... :-) This was the second biggest linux-next ever (in terms of commits) the one before v3.8 was somewhat larger). (No merge commits counted, next-20130429 was the last linux-next before v3.9) Commits in v3.10-rc1 (relative to v3.9): 11963 Commits in next-20130429: 11300 Commits with the same SHA1: 9708 Commits with the same patch_id: 885 (1) Commits with the same subject line: 91 (1) (1) not counting those in the lines above. So commits in -rc1 that were "in" next-20130429: 10684 89.3% (down from 90.6% last time) Commits in -rc1 that were not in next-20120722: 1279 10.7% Pretty good, but it would be still nice to figure out where the last lot came from. I have the "git log --oneline --no-walk" list if someone wants them. Some breakdown of that list: Top ten first word of commit summary: 27 NVMe 29 xfs 41 drm 47 powerpc 59 rbd 64 arm 78 media 84 mips 92 SCSI 101 btrfs Top ten authors: 19 Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 19 Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 21 Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> 22 James Smart <james.smart@xxxxxxxxxx> 25 John Crispin <blogic@xxxxxxxxxxx> 26 Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@xxxxxxxxxx> 28 Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 31 Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@xxxxxxxxx> 35 Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 64 Alex Elder <elder@xxxxxxxxxxx> Top ten commiters: 29 Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx> 43 Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 44 Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 54 Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxx> 59 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 80 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx> 87 Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 92 James Bottomley <JBottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 99 Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 111 David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Quite a few of these could be bug fixes (especially DaveM's). -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
pgpwleE4NMkGc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
