>No, the link errors are for __ctzdi2, not __clzdi2.
>__ctzdi2 can be implemented using __ffs().
>> How's about we stop using __builtin_ctz[ll]() altogether? Use N-fls()?
>
>That was my first suggestion ;-)
>
Do we remove existing __builtin_ct[l]z?
Some architecture's __builtin_clz will be more optimized than N-fls
IMHO, This is not only about __builtin- but also supporting another
libgcc functions in kernel.
Some future user may need __clz[t]s[d]i2 symbol also.
>> btw, this:
>>
>> int __weak __clzsi2(int val)
>> {
>> return BITS_PER_LONG - fls(val);
>> }
>>
>> looks wrong. It will give a different result for 32- and 64-bit.
>
>Indeed. It should be hardcoded 32.
>
I will re-work this for 64-bit, and ctz also.
Thanks
Chanho Min
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
