Hi Mauro,
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 06:48:28AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Wed, 10 Apr 2013 08:42:53 +0200
> Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> escreveu:
>
> > Hi Stephen,
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 01:48:13PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi Samuel,
> > >
> > > Today's linux-next merge of the mfd tree got a conflict in
> > > drivers/mfd/Kconfig between commit 3f8ec5df11aa ("[media] mfd: Add header
> > > files and Kbuild plumbing for SI476x MFD core") from the v4l-dvb tree and
> > > commit ab85b120e692 ("mfd: Kconfig alphabetical re-ordering") from the
> > > mfd tree.
> > I'm surprised the v4l-dvb tree is carrying this patchset because I haven't
> > ACKed it.
>
> Sorry. Not sure why I understood that you gave your ack. Perhaps I miss-read
> one of the comments of that thread.
I haven't heard back from Andrey yet. If I don't get anything from him on
Wednesday, would you mind reverting this patchset ? I have not ACKed it
because it breaks bisectability, and it conflicts with mfd-next.
Andrey, any plans to adress my comments from last week ?
Cheers,
Samuel.
--
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
