On 04/15/2013 12:42 PM, Dirk Brandewie wrote:
On 04/15/2013 10:27 AM, Nathan Zimmer wrote:
On 04/15/2013 11:07 AM, Dirk Brandewie wrote:
On 04/13/2013 02:55 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 12:51 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Friday, April 12, 2013 11:08:37 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Sedat Dilek
<sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Sedat Dilek
<sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Sedat Dilek
<sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Viresh Kumar
<viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On 10 April 2013 11:44, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I found this "[RFC PATCH] kbuild: Build linux-tools package
with 'make
deb-pkg'" from February 2012.
Can't say what happened to it...
Sedat,
Sorry for being late. I am down with Fever and throat
infection since
few days.
Still struggling with it..
There are few things i tried. Firstly the tag: next-20130326
is bad as
there are
some bad commits in cpufreq core in it.
I then tried latest linux-next/master on my Thinkpad (model name
: Intel(R)
Core(TM) i7-2640M CPU @ 2.80GHz) and couldn't boot it up. My
ubuntu
just hanged.
Then i tried Rafael's linux-next branch
079576f Merge branch 'pm-cpufreq-next' into linux-next
And couldn't find any issues with it. I am easily able to
remove/add
cpus at
runtime..
Can you give this branch a try?
OK, you seem to be well again, nice to hear.
I was doing the whole week spring-cleaning in the apartment of
my parents.
Now, I have some minutes for a compilation run.
I guess "cpufreq: Call __cpufreq_governor() with correct
policy->cpus
mask" could be the correct fix, but will try the GIT branch
you have
mentioned.
- Sedat -
[1]
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git/commit/?h=linux-next&id=e4969ebac83fdea78d89c779331396728a4e6199
Both BROKEN here, specific pm-next commitid and pulling
pm.git#linux-next into next-20130411 (see attached files).
Is "cpufreq: convert cpufreq_driver to using RCU" the root
cause of this
all?
[ CC Nathan ]
NO, wrong assumption.
2013-04-12 18:04 Sedat Dilek o [revert-cpufreq-rcu] Revert
"cpufreq: convert cpufreq_driver to using RCU"
2013-04-12 18:04 Sedat Dilek o Revert "cpufreq: Call
__cpufreq_governor() with correct policy->cpus mask"
2013-04-11 23:24 Rafael J. Wysocki M─┐ [pm-next-079576f] Merge
branch
'pm-cpufreq-next' into linux-next
- Sedat -
- Sedat -
[1]
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git/commit/?h=linux-next&id=5800043b2488a1c4c6e859af860644d37419d58b
--
viresh
[ TO Dirk (Author of Intel pstate driver) ]
With CONFIG_X86_INTEL_PSTATE=n (unset) I do not see the call-trace!
My kernel-config and dmesg are attached.
You're seeing a trouble with a new driver, then, so that's not a
regression.
This IS a regression.
If the intel_pstate driver is being used __cpufreq_governor() should
NOT be
called intel_pstate does not implement the target() callback.
Nathan's commit 5800043b2 changed the fence around the call to
__cpufreq_governor() in __cpufreq_remove_dev() here is the relevant
hunk.
@@ -1007,9 +1068,12 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev(struct device
*dev,
struct subsys_interface *sif
unsigned int cpu = dev->id, ret, cpus;
unsigned long flags;
struct cpufreq_policy *data;
+ struct cpufreq_driver *driver;
struct kobject *kobj;
struct completion *cmp;
struct device *cpu_dev;
+ bool has_target;
+ int (*exit)(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
pr_debug("%s: unregistering CPU %u\n", __func__, cpu);
@@ -1025,14 +1089,19 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev(struct
device *dev,
struct subsys_interface *sif
return -EINVAL;
}
- if (cpufreq_driver->target)
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ driver = rcu_dereference(cpufreq_driver);
+ has_target = driver->target ? true : false;
+ exit = driver->exit;
+ if (has_target)
__cpufreq_governor(data, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP);
#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
- if (!cpufreq_driver->setpolicy)
+ if (!driver->setpolicy)
strncpy(per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_governor, cpu),
data->governor->name, CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN);
#endif
+ rcu_read_unlock();
WARN_ON(lock_policy_rwsem_write(cpu));
cpus = cpumask_weight(data->cpus);
I am not clear at what is at issue. Are you saying
__cpufreq_governor can
change the value of cpufreq_driver->target? I hadn't thought that
was allowed
but if it is the code would need to be fixed.
Sorry I think pointing to your patch may have red herring see viresh's
mail.
The issue is that __cpufreq_governor() is being called when
intel_pstate is the
scaling driver intel_pstate does not implement ->target(). From the stack
trace it looked like this was happening in __cpufreq_remove_dev() so I
"assumed"
it was the first instance of the target fence that was failing.
I am rebuilding using the next tree with viresh's patch I will let you
know what
I find sorry for the noise.
--Dirk
Nate
No worries. I would rather see extra noise from linux-next then extra
bugs in the mainline.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
