Hi Roger,
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 04:46:51PM +0200, Roger Quadros wrote:
> On 02/11/2013 08:52 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [130210 22:11]:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> >> arch/arm/mach-omap2/usb-host.c between commit 8a89e93237e1 ("mfd:
> >> omap-usb-host: Consolidate OMAP USB-HS platform data") from the mfd tree
> >> and commit c1d1cd597fc7 ("ARM: OMAP2+: omap_device: remove obsolete
> >> pm_lats and early_device code") from the arm-soc tree.
> >>
> >> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> >> is required).
> >
> > Thanks again.
> >
> > Samuel, up to you, but I suggest you just drop these patches for
> > now if still possible unless other patches are based on these.
> >
>
> Samuel, please feel free to drop the 20 patches you pulled from me recently.
>
> I have another set patches that would depend on them and I think it is better if
> both sets go through usb and arm-soc trees. This would avoid some confusion.
>
> Once you confirm I can add your Acked-by's to them and send fresh pull requests
> to Tony & Greg. Thanks.
I dropped all those patches from my mfd for-next tree now.
Cheers,
Samuel.
--
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
