Hi Andrew, On Wed, 6 Feb 2013 22:23:57 -0800 Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > hm, not sure what you meant by "bad" but that patch went and took the > nice fits-in-80-cols kvm code and mucked it all up. Shall unmuck > tomorrow. "bad" in the sense that there was lots of white space changes to lines not otherwise touched by the patch and those white space changes introduced extra levels of tabs (so the indentation was incorrect) and merged some lines. I unmucked some of it, but got bored :-) -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
pgp7XIY3rJDan.pgp
Description: PGP signature