Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 04:22:53AM CET, sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in
>net/ipv6/route.c between commit bd30e947207e ("ipv6: do not create
>neighbor entries for local delivery") from the net tree and commit
>c440f1609b65 ("ipv6: Do not depend on rt->n in ip6_pol_route()") from the
>net-next tree.
>
>I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary
>(no action is required).
>
>--
>Cheers,
>Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>diff --cc net/ipv6/route.c
>index 363d8b7,f3328bc..0000000
>--- a/net/ipv6/route.c
>+++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
>@@@ -928,7 -884,7 +884,7 @@@ restart
> dst_hold(&rt->dst);
> read_unlock_bh(&table->tb6_lock);
>
>- if (!rt->n && !(rt->rt6i_flags & (RTF_NONEXTHOP | RTF_LOCAL)))
> - if (!(rt->rt6i_flags & (RTF_NONEXTHOP | RTF_GATEWAY)))
>++ if (!(rt->rt6i_flags & (RTF_NONEXTHOP | RTF_LOCAL | RTF_GATEWAY)))
I believe that no change here is correct to do. RTF_LOCAL here is needed
only before Yoshifuji's "IPv6 rt->n removal"
> nrt = rt6_alloc_cow(rt, &fl6->daddr, &fl6->saddr);
> else if (!(rt->dst.flags & DST_HOST))
> nrt = rt6_alloc_clone(rt, &fl6->daddr);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
