On Fri, 2013-01-25 at 10:09 +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Fri, 25 Jan 2013 00:38:06 +0200,
> Stratos Karafotis wrote:
> > Fix the following build warnings
> > sound/pci/hda/patch_sigmatel.c: In function ‘stac92hd71bxx_fixup_hp’:
> > sound/pci/hda/patch_sigmatel.c:2434:24: warning: unused variable ‘spec’ [-Wunused-variable]
[]
> I'm going to fix the definition of snd_printd() itself for fixing this
> kind of warnings. We can use inline functions instead of empty macros
> to achieve the same but without triggering compiler warnings.
It's probably better to use a macro like:
do { \
if (0) \
printk(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
} while (0)
to allow the compiler to avoid any argument evaluation
while still doing fmt/arg matching.
Something like:
include/sound/core.h | 13 +++++++++++--
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/sound/core.h b/include/sound/core.h
index 93896ad..ce5d224 100644
--- a/include/sound/core.h
+++ b/include/sound/core.h
@@ -394,8 +394,17 @@ void __snd_printk(unsigned int level, const char *file, int line,
#else /* !CONFIG_SND_DEBUG */
-#define snd_printd(fmt, args...) do { } while (0)
-#define _snd_printd(level, fmt, args...) do { } while (0)
+#define snd_printd(fmt, ...) \
+do { \
+ if (0) \
+ __snd_printk(1, __FILE__, __LINE__, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
+} while (0)
+#define _snd_printd(level, fmt, ...) \
+do { \
+ if (0) \
+ __snd_printk(level, __FILE__, __LINE__, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
+} while (0)
+
#define snd_BUG() do { } while (0)
static inline int __snd_bug_on(int cond)
{
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
