On 2013-01-24 10:06, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:28:38 -0800 Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > on i386:
> >
> > CC [M] drivers/tty/serial/pch_uart.o
> > drivers/tty/serial/pch_uart.c: In function 'pch_uart_hal_read':
> > drivers/tty/serial/pch_uart.c:572:11: error: 'struct uart_port' has no member named 'sysrq'
> > make[4]: *** [drivers/tty/serial/pch_uart.o] Error 1
> >
> >
> >
> > when SERIAL_PCH_UART_CONSOLE is not enabled.
>
Seems so .. but I have SERIAL_PCH_UART_CONSOLE and MAGIC_SYSRQ off
both .. then still has no issue on my side. So I guess that is because
I have CONFIG_SERIAL_CORE_CONSOLE then it works here:
#if defined(CONFIG_SERIAL_CORE_CONSOLE) || defined(SUPPORT_SYSRQ)
unsigned long sysrq; /* sysrq timeout */
#endif
In serial_core.h.
> Caused by commit 1f9db0921f21 ("pch_uart: add sysrq support") from the
> tty tree. (added cc's)
>
Sorry, I think we need the below fix to work with
'CONFIG_SERIAL_CORE_CONSOLE is not set' && 'PCH_UART_CONSOLE is not
set' case:
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/pch_uart.c b/drivers/tty/serial/pch_uart.c
index c5ee7d45..4771aac 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/pch_uart.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/pch_uart.c
@@ -573,10 +573,12 @@ static int pch_uart_hal_read(struct eg20t_port *priv, unsigned char *buf,
if (uart_handle_break(port))
continue;
}
+#ifdef SUPPORT_SYSRQ
if (port->sysrq) {
if (uart_handle_sysrq_char(port, rbr))
continue;
}
+#endif
buf[i++] = rbr;
}
---
Should I add a fix for the compile error .. or do squash then send out
refreshed patch ?
Best regards,
Liang Li
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
