Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 (acpi)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Friday, January 18, 2013 05:42:20 PM Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 01/17/13 20:37, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > Changes since 20130117:
>> >
>>
>>
>> on x86_64:
>>
>>   CC      drivers/acpi/device_pm.o
>> drivers/acpi/device_pm.c:778:5: error: redefinition of 'acpi_dev_suspend_late'
>> In file included from include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h:29:0,
>>                  from drivers/acpi/device_pm.c:33:
>> include/linux/acpi.h:526:19: note: previous definition of 'acpi_dev_suspend_late' was here
>> drivers/acpi/device_pm.c:810:5: error: redefinition of 'acpi_dev_resume_early'
>> In file included from include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h:29:0,
>>                  from drivers/acpi/device_pm.c:33:
>> include/linux/acpi.h:527:19: note: previous definition of 'acpi_dev_resume_early' was here
>> drivers/acpi/device_pm.c:828:5: error: redefinition of 'acpi_subsys_prepare'
>> In file included from include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h:29:0,
>>                  from drivers/acpi/device_pm.c:33:
>> include/linux/acpi.h:528:19: note: previous definition of 'acpi_subsys_prepare' was here
>> drivers/acpi/device_pm.c:846:5: error: redefinition of 'acpi_subsys_suspend_late'
>> In file included from include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h:29:0,
>>                  from drivers/acpi/device_pm.c:33:
>> include/linux/acpi.h:529:19: note: previous definition of 'acpi_subsys_suspend_late' was here
>> drivers/acpi/device_pm.c:861:5: error: redefinition of 'acpi_subsys_resume_early'
>> In file included from include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h:29:0,
>>                  from drivers/acpi/device_pm.c:33:
>> include/linux/acpi.h:530:19: note: previous definition of 'acpi_subsys_resume_early' was here
>> make[3]: *** [drivers/acpi/device_pm.o] Error 1
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Full randconfig file is attached.
>
> Thanks, I'll take it for inclusion into the build testing framework.
>
> The appended patch fixes the problem for me.
>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
>
>
> ---
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: ACPI / PM: Fix build for unusual combination of Kconfig options
>
> CONFIG_PM_SLEEP may be set even if CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP is unset,
> although that is unusual.  For this reason, make the headers of
> functions built for both CONFIG_ACPI and CONFIG_PM_SLEEP set
> simultaneously depend on that combination of Kconfig options
> instead of CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP.
>
> This fixes a build problem reported by Randy Dunlap.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  include/linux/acpi.h |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: linux-pm/include/linux/acpi.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/include/linux/acpi.h
> +++ linux-pm/include/linux/acpi.h

Can you tell me how do you create such a patch with "Index:" line?

linux-pm.orig as a reference is not very meaninful :-).

If this is against Linux-Next (next-20130118) I would like to see:
--- next-20130118.orig/path/to/file
+++ next-20130118/path/to/file

I had used 'git format-patch' with '--subject-prefix="PATCH
next-20130118"' option in such a case.
Just as a hint by not telling you how you should do your job.

/me is still a Git n00b!

- Sedat -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux