On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:36:02AM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 04:46:17AM +0000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Today's linux-next merge of the signal tree got a conflict in
> > arch/arm64/kernel/signal32.c between commits 068f1bb36cf1 ("arm64:
> > compat: include sa_restorer in old action from rt_sigaction") and
> > efed4d52e39f ("arm64: compat: ensure access_ok checks are performed on
> > user structures") from the arm64 tree and various commits from the signal
> > tree.
> >
> > The latter removes the code modified by the former, so I did that.
>
> I think the fix is fine. I'll give Al's patches a test and I can
> probably drop Will's patches.
Yup, although it looks like we need to #define __ARCH_HAS_SA_RESTORER for
compat_sys_rt_sigaction.
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
