Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the btrfs tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Chris,

On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 21:52:41 -0500 Chris Mason <chris.mason@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 05:15:04PM -0700, Chris Mason wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 04:00:22PM -0700, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Josef and I have sob on all of our commits (at least all the ones not in
> > 3.7, I didn't go back farther).  In this case the Author was Stefan and
> > it ended up rebased in either Josef's or my tree.  We usually try to
> > preserve merges on rebase, but this time was a bigger set of changes
> > than usual and it didn't work out.
> 
> Just FYI, I've pushed out a fixed version of the tree with proper
> signed-off-by on all the commits, thanks for catching that.
> 
> It also has the fix for the ppc compile problems.  (This isn't a pull
> request yet, I've got the hash collision fix and a few others pending as
> well).

You do realise that I just fetch your tree/branch each day, right?  So it
will be in tomorrow's linux-next.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: pgpHeN6O87NJa.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux