Re: Request for tree inclusion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2012/12/2 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Well, these are a bit late (I expected Linus to release v3.7 today), but
> since Ingo has not piped in over the weekend, I have added them from today
> after the tip tree merge.

Yeah sorry to submit that so late. Those branches are in pending pull
requests to the -tip tree and I thought about relying on the
propagation of -tip into -next as usual. But Ingo has been very busy
with numa related work during this cycle. So until these branches get
merged in -tip, I'm short-circuiting a bit the -next step before it
becomes too late for the next merge window.

>
> I have called them fw-cputime, fs-sched and fw-nohz respectively and
> listed you as the only contact in case of problems.

Ok.

> If these are to be
> long term trees included in linux-next, I would prefer that you use
> better branch names - otherwise, if they are just short term, please tell
> me to remove them when they are finished with.

They are definitely short term. I'll tell you once these can be dropped.

Thanks a lot!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux