On 2012-11-12 14:07, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:15:40 +1100
> Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in
>> drivers/memstick/core/ms_block.h between commit 0604fa04ccc7 ("memstick:
>> add support for legacy memorysticks") that use to be in the block tree
>> and commits "memstick: remove unused field from state struct", "memstick:
>> ms_block: fix compile issue", "memstick: use after free in
>> msb_disk_release()" and "memstick: memory leak on error in msb_ftl_scan
>> ()" from the akpm tree.
>>
>> The block tree commit has been dropped, so the 4 akpm tree patches no
>> longer have anything to apply to, so I have dropped them.
>
> Confused. Who dropped "memstick: add support for legacy memorysticks"?
> You, or Jens?
I dropped it for 3.7 submission, that's why it disappeared from my
for-next.
> Assuming the block-tree memstick patches will rematerialise, I'll send
> those patches at Jens.
Thanks, I'll queue them up.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
